To implement the UNDAF, the UN system establishes and clarifies roles, responsibilities and necessary processes for oversight, coordination, management, partnership arrangements, planning, monitoring and evaluation. In line with the UN commitment to national ownership through strengthening national capacities, these arrangements maximize the use of national systems and available UN competencies and resources, and are grounded in the international norms and standards that the UN system upholds.

Effective implementation requires that all UN members operate in a manner that promotes coherence, ensuring that core programming principles and approaches are fully considered and applied under the unifying principle of leaving no one behind. To this end, the UN system commits adequate resources to UNDAF management arrangements. Organizations need to establish incentives for their staff to consistently contribute to inter-agency mechanisms for delivering on the UNDAF, such as by integrating this expectation in their performance plans.

Roles and Responsibilities

The UNDG Management and Accountability System (MAS), including the functional Resident Coordinator firewall, provides an overview of the responsibilities and accountabilities of key actors, including in the context of developing and implementing an UNDAF. Key roles are identified for the Resident Coordinator and members of the UNCT (UN Management and Accountability System).

The Resident Coordinator facilitates and oversees the CCA, and the design and implementation of the UNDAF. Where required, the Resident Coordinator may also propose amendments to the UNDAF and the joint work plans if some activities are no longer aligned with the broader strategy of the UNDS to respond to national needs and priorities.

Further details on specific roles, responsibilities and accountabilities are found in the integrated guidance for the SOPs. When feasible, UNDAF design and implementation arrangements align with existing broader national coordination mechanisms to avoid duplicating these mechanisms and to keep transaction costs to a minimum while ensuring national ownership and leadership. Figure 3 represents a typical implementation arrangement, although this may differ in countries with UN missions.

The Joint National/UN Steering Committee, co-chaired by the government coordinating entity and the Resident Coordinator, reviews and guides the strategic direction of the UNDAF and the joint work plans, providing high-level oversight and support. Its generic terms of reference (One-Programme Tools & Materials) reflect the spirit of national ownership, although final details are decided by the Resident Coordinator and UNCT depending on local context and in consultation with the government. The steering committee meets at least once per year during the UNDAF annual review to discuss data and evidence collected during monitoring for assessing progress against the indicators, horizon-scanning, updating risk analysis, and assessing performance in forming partnerships, resource mobilization and delivery.

UNDAF Results Groups[22] are an arrangement for the implementation of one or more UNDAF strategic priorities. They are typically internal UN working mechanisms that ensure a coherent UN approach. Results Groups should be aligned to existing nationally led coordination mechanisms whenever possible. Where such mechanisms do not exist, the UN system can promote their creation. Depending on country context, national and international stakeholders may be included in Results Groups (One-Programme Tools & Materials)

Joint work plans

Joint work plans are managed by Results Groups and define output-level results, activities and an annual CBF. They enable the UN system to advance coherence, coordinate work around the delivery of the UNDAF outcomes, and support transparency and accountability. Organization-specific work plans complement UNDAF joint work plans, where relevant. In formulating and carrying out joint work plans, Results Group do the following:

  • Identify outputs where two or more agencies can complete each other’s efforts, including through joint programming, and outline the roles of different members in achieving common results.
  • Coordinate and manage the implementation of interventions in a coherent manner, to achieve common results;
  • Identify joint communications and advocacy opportunities to achieve common results;
  • Ensure that outputs are costed, available resources identified, and the funding gap calculated and reported on;
  • Develop and sign joint work plans with relevant UN organizations and whenever possible with the government;
  • Periodically review and revise the joint work plans as necessary;
  • Prepare inputs for the annual One UN Country Results Report.

In countries with UN missions, implementation can be facilitated through joint work plans overseen by Results Groups with both UN mission and UN agency members. The work plans provide a transparent overview of the activities of UN actors working in the country and create a better division of labour. Activities can either be implemented by the mission alone or jointly with one or more UN entities. In countries with humanitarian operations, humanitarian actors can contribute to joint work plans, and efforts can be made to ensure coherence and complementarity between humanitarian and development actions. For more information, see the SOPs for countries adopting the “Delivering as One” approach, and the companion document One Programme Tools and Materials: Tips and Template for Joint Work Plans (One-Programme Tools & Materials).

Joint programming and joint programmes: Mutual reinforcement

Joint programming is the collective effort through which UN organizations and national partners work together to prepare, implement, monitor and evaluate activities aimed at effectively and efficiently achieving the SDGs and other international commitments, within the framework of the UNDAF and the joint work plans.

Within joint work plans, the United Nations may identify the need for increased joint delivery through the development of one or more joint programme(s). A joint programme is a set of activities contained in a joint work plan and related budgetary framework, involving two or more UN organizations, and intended to achieve results aligned with national priorities as reflected in the UNDAF. Joint programmes can be funded through pooled funds. While the joint programme arrangement is only between UN organizations, other stakeholders can be engaged as implementing partners. UN missions and humanitarian actors are also invited to engage in joint programmes, where appropriate, depending on the country context. Joint programmes can be attractive to funding partners, since the modality provides greater assurance of UN coherence in delivering results.


[22] The Results Groups contribute to specific UNDAF outcomes through coordinated and collaborative planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation.

Related Blogs and Country stories

Silo Fighters Blog

Unlocking Solutions Through Positive Deviance in Palestine

BY Hadeel Abdo | February 6, 2019

To accelerate joint learning through experimenting innovative methods into our work, several UN agencies, funds and programmes working in Palestine opened the Palestine Innovation Lab spearheaded by UN Women in the spring of 2018. Change leaders and facilitators from the Welfare Improvement Network supported us with the initial setting and operation of the lab. Five UN agencies quickly adopted the Positive Deviance approach to discover successful behaviours that individuals (‘positive deviants’) practice in their own community, often against the grain of harmful norms. Adopting the positive deviance approach requires a paradigm shift: define the problem and therein lies the solution. Picture a half-filled glass: if the problem is the empty half, the solution is the full half. This approach is challenging us to reimagine how change can come from within the community itself. Positive deviants: a solution from within The first step before identifying positive deviants is to recognize that there is an existing problem. Defining the problem may seem simple but it is not. With the positive deviance approach, you have to push deeper to understand the ‘hows’ and the ‘whys’ of a problem. Without defining a concrete problem, it is very difficult to unlock solutions. Experimenting with the positive deviance approach The Innovation Lab is currently applying positive deviance to existing projects from UN Women, UNDP, UNICEF, UN-Habitat and UNODC. This experiment is helping the organizations to unveil and implement sustainable solutions to complex problems in Palestine. Men championing gender equality In Palestine, UN Women is working with local community-based organizations to identify men who, contrary to common practice, support the right of women to inherit property, share household work and childcare with their wives. These men are both the solution to the problem and the solution provider, actively encouraging their peers to change their behaviour to advance gender equality. Their strategies are direct and personal: knocking on people’s doors, giving lectures, and drawing attention to  the importance of gender equality on social media. For example, Yousef Nassar, a radio-show host, is using his platform to talk about how men can promote gender equality at home and workplace. In the southern part of Gaza, an Imam from the local community uses the Friday prayers to encourage young people and their families to refrain from early marriage. As a result, a number of couples have decided to postpone marriage until the age of 18. UN Women is also raising awareness on women’s equal access to economic opportunities and decent work using the positive deviance approach – putting forward women entrepreneurs and business leaders. Fostering inclusive leaders As part of the ‘Al Fakhoora Dynamic Futures Programme’, UNDP identified 30 young post-secondary female and male students from underserved backgrounds as positive deviants. Through the initiative, the students will have a better chance to realize their full potential and overcome their socioeconomic, political and cultural limitations, while encouraging peers from their own community to adopt positive behaviours.     Together with PalVision, a local NGO with a focus on youth, UNICEF is working to reduce violence and harassment by male students at a local school in Bethany in East Jerusalem. In the town of Barta’a in Area C, West Bank, UN-Habitat is supporting the Palestinian local authorities to deliver planning functions to communities at risk of displacement in the Israeli Controlled Area C. UNODC is promoting youth crime prevention through sports, in partnership with the Higher Council for Youth and Sport, to identify sports coaches and teachers who demonstrated a strong sensitivity towards gender issues. The 'positive deviants', with the support of the community-based organizations, have begun to design strategies to amplify positive behaviours within their own community to promote gender equality. Our role in positive deviance approach To ensure that communities have a total ownership over the process, we should take on the role of observers, not as experts or implementers. That is the beauty, or challenge, of the positive deviance approach. We have to patiently wait for the positive deviants to bring the changes from within and themselves. What we learned through applying positive deviance in Palestine is that ‘positive deviants’ should be from the community itself. Listening to what neighbours have to say about changing certain behaviours resonates more than having outsiders say the same thing. This is the power of positive deviance. The “experts” or “outsiders” from international agencies and civil society organizations should simply be positioned observers of the process, and the community should take centre stage, becoming both the implementers and recipients of change. Have you used positive deviance approach to implement a project? If so, please share your experience with us!

Silo Fighters Blog

What we Learned About Testing a Platform-Based Business Model at the UN in Moldova

BY Dumitru Vasilescu | January 30, 2019

Earlier last year, we were on a quest to test whether a platform-based organizational model would fit the new generation of UN Country Teams. A platform-based business model creates value by facilitating exchanges between two or more interdependent groups. To make these exchanges happen, platforms create large scalable networks of users and resources that can be accessed on demand. If you think about it, we at the UN in Moldova have all the ingredients to apply this approach in our work. We have 11 agencies with permanent presence in Moldova. We also have seven agencies without an office in the country which contribute to national development— remotely or on an ad-hoc basis. While these programmes, funds, and specialized agencies have their own mandate, leadership, and funding, they do have one thing in common: they are seeking to drive progress in multiple development areas. So we thought, why not combine the UN’s diverse presence in the country to address multiple barriers to sustainable and accelerated achievement of the country’s development goals such as poverty reduction, reproductive health, gender equality and food security at the same time to help ensure a multi-faceted approach to development? This is our story so far. Lesson 1: Our current system is too fragmented and requires re-thinking One thing is clear. The UN aspires to support every country’s effort to achieve the 2030 Agenda. In Moldova, we believe that it’s important to redesign and rethink the way that people, ideas and resources intersect and interact to maximize the effectiveness of development assistance. At the core of our work is our own effort to adopt the Delivering As One approach, where we focus on our internal human resources and their ability and skill to innovate, measure impact of the programmatic work and identify new areas for collaborative intervention. What we did notice is that we’re very fragmented on several levels, including non-coordinated interventions, competition for scarce funding, difficulties to coordinate work of non-residential agencies, unclear boundaries of the agencies’ mandates, and the list could go on. There are areas where we’ve successfully managed to work together as a UN Country Team. One example of this is the Gender Thematic Group. Through this group, agencies that work on women’s empowerment and gender equality meet regularly, learn about each other’s plans and programmes, and try to achieve more consistency and alignment through their interventions. The Youth Thematic Group is another good example because it’s meant for designing interventions that support youth and involve coordinated inter-agency work. Lesson 2: It’s imperative to do a detailed analysis of the current situation using a systematic approach With the guidance of the Resident Coordinator Office, UN agencies did a complex analysis of the current situation to scope out areas of cooperation between agencies. We also did a complex foresight exercise and an organizational network analysis to understand the current and future areas where our functions can intertwine and where a platform-based model would make sense. After we did the foresight exercise, we discovered that there are several areas where it makes more sense for UN agencies and the UN Country Team to act together. These areas include migration and children, coordination of non-residential and residential agencies, collaborative interventions (joint work programmes and projects), leveraging existing partnerships and harmonizing business practices. Through this exercise, we were also able to see that as the UN, we could take three possible and plausible scenarios of development into consideration to achieve the 2030 Agenda in the country and beyond. These scenarios are: The Future is Near (business-as-usual), Virtuous and Vicious and a scenario titled 'Transformers, as the third one. Source: UN, Foresight exercise Lesson 3: Not everything can work on a platform-based model Taking a collaborative approach around specific interventions, functions or internal business processes requires adopting a new modus operandi. To ensure that these collaborative efforts are sustainable from both an operational and financial standpoint, it’s important to build strong relationships with the teams that you are going to collaborate with, have a solid value proposition for local partners and have the ability to meet a need of a specific target group. It’s not all about the technology, but the people. We are new to the concept of the ‘UN-as-a-platform’ and there are no previous or current business cases using this approach throughout the organization to guide us. What exactly can we put in platforms in the future? Can we build a platform-like collaborative ecosystem based on trust, mutual benefits for the UN agencies and partners on the ground? How do we build a strong value proposition to last for much longer that a usual programmatic cycle? These are some of the questions that we are currently trying to find answers to. Are you working on applying a platform-based model in the UN? If so, talk to us.