Tags:

26. This section sets out a brief checklist with concrete actions that the RC and UN Country Team can undertake to meet the human rights responsibilities set out above. This checklist was developed from RCs’ suggestions, based on their experiences. Where relevant, more detailed guidance on how to address these matters is provided in the following section.

What to do first

A Checklist for Resident Coordinators

 WHAT TO DO  WHERE TO FIND INFORMATION
 1. UNDERSTAND THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN THE COUNTRY
 A ) Understand the normative framework and identify human rights opportunities and challenges  for working with the government (most of this can be done before you arrive to the country)
FIND OUT which core human rights instruments were ratified by the  country, what reservations the country may have made, and their  reporting status.  Status of ratification—Interactive  dashboard;

 Status of reporting

IDENTIFY what the government has committed to, in terms of the  recommendations in the previous UPR cycle that the government has  either supported or noted, and any voluntary commitments it has made.  UPRoutcome of the review’ report;

 Universal Human Rights Index;

UPR-info database (not official)

IDENTIFY critical recommendations of treaty bodies in their concluding  observations to the country, as well as any follow-up by the  government.  Concluding observations of treaty bodies

 Universal Human Rights Index;

 UPR ‘compilation of UN information’  reports

FIND OUT whether the country has issued a standing invitation to special procedures, which special procedures have visited the country, the recommendations they have made, and any follow-up by the government. Reports of the country visits of special procedures;

Universal Human Rights Index;

UPR ‘compilation of UN information’ reports

ANALYSE any national human rights action plans (NAPs) adopted by the government (if such exist), and any reports on follow-up of accepted UPR recommendations, as well as recommendations by treaty bodies and special procedures (if such exist). Discuss with the relevant government authority and the NHRI;

Web-based Guide  on Strengthening Engagement with the International Human Rights Machinery (forthcoming);

UPR implementation information provided by States to OHCHR

IDENTIFY upcoming opportunities to engage with international human rights mechanisms (upcoming UPR and treaty body reviews and visits of Special Rapporteurs) and use these opportunities for leverage. Yearly letter from the Co-Chairs of the UNDG HRWG to RCs;

OHCHR – Human rights by country

B) Analyse the human rights situation
CARRY OUT a quick analyses of the human rights situation, including mapping key challenges and identifying the most marginalized rights holders and the most powerful/crucial duty bearers.  

Thereafter, carry out regular country analyses to stay attuned to the human rights situation in the country, as required by HRuF, including through holding at least two full UN Country Team meetings per year on the human rights situation.  

Discuss with agency representatives, the in-country Human Rights Adviser (if any), OHCHR field presence (if any), or OHCHR HQ desk officer;

Review the latest UPR background reports on the country (three reports by national, UN and other stakeholders);

Review the latest concluding observations of treaty bodies and special procedures (Universal Human Rights Index)

ASSESS the level of civil society engagement, public participation, voice and media freedom in the country. Discuss with agency representatives, the in-country Human Rights Adviser (if any), OHCHR field presence (if any), or OHCHR HQ desk officer;

Review NGO submissions by NGOs to Treaty Bodies;

Review the NGO submissions to UPR’ and ‘Mid-term implementation assessments’ at UPR-info (not official)

CONDUCT mapping/rapid assessment of international partners and donors who support ongoing human rights-related programmes and projects, and identify possible areas of cooperation. Discuss with agency representatives, the in-country Human Rights Adviser (if any), OHCHR field presence (if any), or OHCHR HQ desk officer;

Review UPR-info’s database of UPR recommendations made by recommending country (including donors) (not official)

IDENTIFY key and potential champions for human rights within the government. Discuss with agency representatives, the in-country Human Rights Adviser (if any), OHCHR field presence (if any), or OHCHR HQ desk officer;
If there is one, ASSESS the strength of the national human rights institution (NHRI), its mandate and status of accreditation. Accreditation status can be found on the website of the ICC Sub-Committee on Accreditation
REVIEW national, regional and international reports of the country on human rights issues, including reports of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), whether present in or outside the country. Reports of national, regional and international NGOs
CONTACT OHCHR to find out the background of individual complaints to treaty bodies and special procedures of the UN Human Rights Council (HRC). OHCHR HQ desk officer
COMMISSION the monitoring of news media to collect and analyse patterns of human rights incidents. Work with UN Country Team’s media unit/spokesperson and Human Rights Adviser (if present) to analyse patterns
REVIEW legislation to assess the extent to which national laws are harmonized with international human rights standards and to assess whether law enforcement practices are in compliance with both national legislation and international law. Discuss with agency representatives the in-country Human Rights Adviser (if any), OHCHR field presence (if any), or OHCHR HQ desk officer;

UPR ‘compilation of UN information’ report;

Review the latest concluding observations of treaty bodies and recommendations of Special Procedures

2. ASSESS CAPACITIES AND FRAMEWORK FOR HUMAN RIGHTS WITHIN AND LINKED TO THE UN COUNTRY TEAM
IMMEDIATE EXPERTISE: Is there an in-country Human Rights Adviser, OHCHR field presence, or human rights component of a UN Peacekeeping Mission?

OTHER IN-HOUSE EXPERTISE: Is there a thematic group within the UN Country Team focusing on human rights? Are there human rights focal points within the UN agencies? Are there agencies in the country or non-resident agencies (NRAs) that have a specific normative mandate or “governance” focus that could contribute to human rights analysis and work?

REGIONAL EXPERTISE: What is the nature of cooperation with regional OHCHR offices? Is there a Regional Human Rights Adviser as part of the UNDG regional team?  

INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT:  Is there cooperation with UNHQ entities, e.g. OHCHR desk officers, UNDG mainstreaming support, Executive Office of the Secretary-General (EOSG) for HRuF support? Has the country situation been referred to the RQR or Senior Action Group (SAG)?

REVIEW how human rights are incorporated into the implementation of the UNDAF and whether there are any support structures available to support the process.

MAP geographical representation of UN agencies with expertise on human rights and how this expertise can contribute to a shared analysis on human rights.

3. BUILD A COMMON STRATEGY AND MOVE TOWARDS COORDINATED ACTION AND ADVOCACY
FORM a team of local and international experts to support and advise the UN Country Team on human rights analysis, interventions and mainstreaming initiatives; this may include NRAs.

INTRODUCE/INSTITUTIONALIZE periodic UN Country Team discussions and information sharing on human rights in order to stay attuned to the human rights situation in the country (as required under HRuF) and to coordinate UN Country Team activities on mainstreaming, advocacy and protection where necessary.

IDENTIFY and discuss with the UN Country Team the possible immediate and longer term actions the UN could take to seize human rights opportunities and tackle challenges from a development perspective.

REVIEW the previous and current UNDAF to identify any previous and outstanding development interventions on human rights and how these can be incorporated as part of an overall human rights strategy.

• Where the UN Country Team is in the UNDAF implementation stage, ARRANGE HRBA training for UN staff and national partners (this is most effective at the analysis stage of the implementation process), to ensure the HRBA is applied from the country analysis through to the UNDAF, and to sensitize partners.

DEVELOP a relationship with the government and other counterparts, arranging courtesy introduction meetings with key duty bearers mapped against the critical challenges in human rights areas.

IDENTIFY key human rights issues for which the UN needs to communicate with one voice and develop common statements on key policy positions.

• If the UN Country Team identifies major risks or actual serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law, DEVELOP a strategy for addressing the situation at the country level and/or escalate the issue up to UNHQ by referral to the RQR, in consultation with OHCHR and the UNDG regional team.

• In humanitarian and mission settings, ENSURE that the protection of civilians and human rights is a central priority for integrated assessment and planning and all humanitarian action.

27. The previous checklist applies to all settings.  However, the RC and UN Country Team will be working in very different contexts—in situations of development, or of escalating crisis, full-blown armed conflict or post-conflict—and this will have a determining impact on the kinds of human rights activities that they can engage in at different points.

28. The following checklist gives a brief overview of the types of activities that the RC and Country Team can carry out in particular contexts, and indicates where to find additional information and guidance. The activities, issues, examples and additional sources shown are not ONLY relevant to the context in which they are shown; rather, this is the context in which these are likely to be MOST relevant.

What to do next

Checklist for Resident Coordinators – Working in Different Contexts

 Working in different contexts Activities on human rights that could be undertaken by the UN Country Team Relevant examples (see following section also) Additional sources of  reference and guidance

Development, non-conflict or protracted conflict

Taking the HRBA to long-term development planningAddressing structural human rights challenges in laws, policies and social practices
Strengthening national human rights protection systems and the rule of law
Promoting human rights culture and human rights education
Staying constantly attuned to the human rights situation through periodic situation analysis (HRuF)Positioning the UN Country Team on human rights challengesResponding to individual cases of human rights violationsProtecting human rights defendersCombating impunity and supporting the rule of law
Delivering more equitable and sustainable development results through the HRBA

Ensuring the active and meaningful participation of the most marginalized in development policies

Using the UN’s authority to promote necessary institutional and social reforms and counter social positions that conflict with human rights norms

Applying the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

Taking collective responsibility to advocate for human rights

Protecting human rights defenders from reprisals for cooperating with the UN

Responding to individual complaints of human rights violations

Human Rights and Development (Policy Committee Decision 2008/18);

Guidance Note on Application of the Programming Principles to the UNDAF;

HRBA Common Learning Package;

Guiding Principles on Business and Human Right;

Overview of Human Rights up Front*

Web-based Guide on Strengthening Engagement with the International Human Rights Machinery (forthcoming)

Escalating tensions Assessing risks of human rights violations

Positioning the UN Country Team on human rights challenges

Responding to individual cases of human rights violations

Protecting human rights defenders

Combating impunity and supporting the rule of law

Joint analysis of situations to identify possible crises and help prevent them from occurring

Taking collective responsibility to advocate for human rights, and prevent or respond to serious human rights violations

Protecting human rights defenders from reprisals for cooperating with the UN

Responding to individual complaints of human rights violations

Human Rights Up Front” Detailed Action Plan (updated March 2014);

Guidance Note on UNCT Conduct and Working Arrangements (Feb 2014);
Overview of Human Rights up Front*;

Web-based Guide on Strengthening Engagement with the International Human Rights Machinery (forthcoming)

Conflict or humanitarian crisis Responding to widespread human rights violations

Protecting civilians in a humanitarian crisis

Supporting accountability efforts

Establishing facts in a crisis situation to defuse tensions and prevent violence

Vetting peace/security forces to prevent those complicit in human rights abuses from participating

Developing and implementing humanitarian response strategies that place protection of human rights at the centre, including in the delivery of humanitarian assistance

Establishing procedures to monitor the conduct of recipient entities in humanitarian assistance

Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (Policy Committee Decision 2013/110);

UN Policy Committee Decision on Human Rights Screening of United Nations Personnel* (Policy Committee Decision);

OHCHR/DPKO/DPA/DFS Policy on Human Rights in UN Peace Operations and Political Missions;

IASC Terms of Reference for for Humanitarian Coordinators (2009);

Centrality of Protection In Humanitarian Action;

Growing the Sheltering Tree: Protecting Rights through Humanitarian Action

Post-conflict or in transition to peace and development Supporting transitional justice, including advocating for accountability for past human rights violations

Supporting constitutional and legal developments in line with human rights standards

Re-establishing the rule of law and strengthening the role of NHRIs

Programming to address the root causes of conflict and re-establish social cohesion

Incorporating human rights standards in peace agreements and transitional justice institutions

Jointly taking a stance to protect the rights of victims to justice and reparations

Supporting civil society efforts to rebuild social cohesion and combat discrimination

Ensuring human rights considerations are duly considered in international financing of development plans

Human Rights and Development (Policy Committee Decision 2008/18);

Guidance Note on the UN Approach to Rule of Law Assistance;

UN Peacebuilding: An Orientation;

OHCHR’s Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States

* To access these documents write to humanrights@undg.org

Related Blogs and Country stories

Silo Fighters Blog

An excellent tool for mainstreaming human rights

BY Jessica Braver, Valeria Guerra, Maria Jeannette Moya | July 28, 2015

The process of reviewing a country’s human rights records can become an opportunity to bond human rights with development. In Argentina, the Universal Periodic Review process has promoted human rights as the daily work of everyone in the UN system. This spirit exemplifies the ‘Human Rights up Front’ initiative. Human rights are at the core of the United Nations mandate. In the UN Charter (1945) and in UN resolutions, we have reaffirmed our faith in fundamental human rights. As UN staff members, we need to bear this in mind in our daily work, regardless of our area of expertise. Improving UN action to safeguard human rights Human Rights up Front seeks to ensure that the UN system takes early and effective action to prevent or respond to large-scale violations of human rights or international humanitarian law. The initiative, launched in 2013 by the UN Secretary-General, calls for a major cultural shift within the UN, placing the protection of human rights and of people at the heart of UN strategies and operational activities. A leading role in human rights mainstreaming Human Rights up Front highlights the role of the UN Resident Coordinator (RC) system in mainstreaming human rights, encouraging us to work together in a more cohesive and coherent way. In Argentina, the Resident Coordinator’s office has been working on positioning the topic in the UN agenda, as well as on building an inter-agency culture for the Universal Periodic Review, so as to install human rights mainstreaming as a priority. What is the Universal Periodic Review? The Universal Periodic Review examines the human rights situation of all 193 UN Member States (A/RES/60/251) under the umbrella of the Human Rights Council. The State under review submits a report declaring what actions it has taken to improve human rights situations in the country. Information is also provided by relevant stakeholders, and by UN international experts and agencies working in the country, who highlight concerns and propose action. Each State is assessed by fellow State representatives, under the principles of cooperation and equal treatment. State delegates then make recommendations for action. The expertise and on-the-ground knowledge of UN agencies, funds and programmes working in each country are invaluable assets for the UPR. And we, as UN officials, must make the most of this opportunity to help improve the human rights situations of our host countries. How we did it in Argentina We welcomed support from the OHCHR The RC’s office has been supported by the Regional Office for South America of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). Argentina participated in the OHCHR UPR Project covering five South American countries, which provided an overall framework for UPR-related matters, information sessions and technical assistance on how to draft our UPR report. OHCHR insisted that the effective engagement of the whole UN system was crucial to a successful UPR process. In the end, Argentina received 119 recommendations in its second UPR (2012), some of which embodied inputs from the UN system, which meant that local agencies, funds and programmes could see their added value reflected in the outcome report. We established the Inter-Agency Group on Human Rights Based on conversations held by the RCO, OHCHR-South America and the Government, the Inter-Agency Group on Human Rights (IAGHR) was set up in 2012. It supports the monitoring of recommendations made to Argentina, having its own duties, coordination mechanisms and work plan. It also puts a special emphasis on including a human rights-based approach in the preparation of the new 2016-2020 Cooperation Framework for Argentina. Five agencies helped hire a human rights advisor At the suggestion of OHCHR, a human rights advisor for the RC’s office was hired to specifically address human rights mainstreaming and to monitor the implementation of UPR recommendations. The position was funded by OHCHR, UNICEF, UNDP, UNODC and UNHCR. The human rights advisor was also part of the five-country OHCHR UPR Project. We created a matrix linking human rights and development The OHCHR UPR Project prepared a matrix systematizing all recommendations made to its countries of coverage. The UN system in Argentina produced its own matrix linking the UPR recommendations with development projects by the different UN entities. By connecting UN initiatives with the UPR recommendations, which were accepted by the country, the UN system found a new and strong source of legitimacy. Further, the State committed to implement the UPR recommendations in four and a half years. We took action with the government and other stakeholders The UN System in Argentina provided support to the government in following-up and implementing UPR recommendations. Also, workshops were held to disseminate the UPR mechanism and its recommendations among UN System, Senate, Judiciary, civil society and ombudsperson’s office. These workshops encouraged the submissions of UPR midterm reports. How can you use the UPR process to enhance human rights? There can be no peace without development, no development without peace, and there is neither without human rights. On one hand, the Universal Periodic Review process presents a unique opportunity to engage Member States in the protection of human rights, and encourages cooperation between States and the exchange of international experiences to strengthen policies and institutions. On the other hand, UPR is a key instrument for the UN System to provide a framework for coherence and joint action among UN System and also opens a window for cooperation with the governments and other stakeholders in the process of follow-up and implementation of UPR recommendations. If you have a story to share about the UPR, please post a comment and links for more information.

Country Stories

Viet Nam Engaging with International Human Rights Mechanisms to Achieve Universal Access to Education

March 8, 2014

The most important reason for us to support mother tongue-based bilingual education is to promote social equality in education by creating equal opportunities for ethnic minority children to have access to quality education. - Mr. ViVan Dieu, Director, Research Centre for Ethnic Minority Education, Viet Nam Institute of Educational Sciences. Abstract As a direct result of Viet Nam undergoing the Universal Periodic Review in May 2009, the government invited six Special Procedures mandate holders of the United Nations Human Rights Council to visit Viet Nam. Four Special Procedures visited Viet Nam during 2010-2011, one of whom was the United Nations Independent Expert on minority issues in July 2010. During her visit, the Independent Expert on minority issues engaged closely with the United Nations country team, which contributed to ensuring that her recommendations reflected the realities, priorities and challenges in the country. The recommendations from the Independent Expert proved a valuable tool for guiding and strengthening efforts to move forward on ensuring equitable and inclusive growth in Viet Nam. In particular, her engagement with UNICEF on the issue of bilingual education for children of ethnic minorities resulted in an explicit reference to UNICEF’s work in this area and a recommendation that this approach be supported and expanded in the country. These recommendations added significant weight and credibility to UNICEF’s work on bilingual education, providing UNICEF with an advocacy tool to raise attention and commitment to this approach. Bilingual education has since been recognized by the Ministry of Education as one of the solutions to reducing disparities in access to education. Background The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam is a one-party state ruled by the Communist Party of Viet Nam. It has an estimated population of 87.8 million people, of which 14.3 percent belong to one of 53 minority ethnic groups.1 Many of these ethnic groups have their own distinct language, religion and cultural identity and live in remote parts of the country. The rest of the population belongs to the majority ethnic group, known as the Kinh. Over the past two decades, Viet Nam has achieved rapid economic growth and has significantly reduced overall poverty rates from 58.1 percent in 1993 to 14.5 percent in 2008.2 As a result of this growth, Viet Nam attained the status of a middle income country in 2010.3 One of the biggest development challenges that Viet Nam faces in the process of transitioning to a middle income country is the widening gap between rich and poor and between different regions. The ‘feminization of poverty’4 is also a growing challenge. Local customs, patriarchal attitudes and traditions have led to gender inequality in the labour market and in political and public life. Furthermore, ethnic minorities continue to be particularly vulnerable to high levels of poverty and inequality. While in 1990, only 18 percent of those living in poverty belonged to ethnic minorities, by 2008 ethnic minorities accounted for almost 56 percent of the poor.5 In 2012, the Committee on the Rights of the Child noted its concern over the lower level of development indicators among ethnic minorities, especially regarding access to health and education.6 Viet Nam faces significant human rights challenges in the area of civil and political rights, including freedom of expression, association and assembly. Space for expressing views on government policies and practices is also limited.7 Education for ethnic minorities The official language used in schools in Viet Nam is Vietnamese. While the law recognizes that ethnic minorities have the right to use their mother tongue in schools in order to preserve and develop their ethnic and cultural identity, the lack of teaching capacity in minority languages has meant that in practice children are taught in Vietnamese only. As many minority communities have only a limited understanding and proficiency in Vietnamese, this has created a language barrier for many of these children. Lack of access to education in their mother tongue, together with the use of Vietnamese, is considered one of the reasons why the net primary school completion rate among ethnic minority children (61 percent) is significantly lower than the rate for Kinh (86 percent). For minority women the problem of illiteracy is particularly acute; literacy rates for ethnic minority women are just 22 percent, as compared to 92 percent for ethnic Kinh women.8 Strategy Engaging with international human rights processes and mechanisms Since 2008, UNDP has been implementing a capacity-building project on human rights treaty reporting with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The project has provided an opportunity for the United Nations country team in Viet Nam to engage with and support the government in its interaction with international human rights mechanisms. Supporting engagement with the Universal Periodic Review, human rights treaty body reporting, sharing knowledge on processes and procedures, and supporting the government in organizing visits of Special Procedures mandate holders of the Human Rights Council proved a useful way to concretize human rights concepts and provide expertise to the government. In May 2009, Viet Nam was assessed under the Universal Periodic Review. This afforded the government an important chance to present an overview of the main opportunities and challenges they faced in meeting their international obligations, as well as to demonstrate progress made toward achieving key commitments under human rights treaties. It also provided an opportunity for the United Nations to support the government to engage effectively with this process. At the government’s request, UNDP, in close coordination with the United Nations country team and with OHCHR Geneva support, facilitated training for government officials on the Universal Periodic Review. As part of this training, UNDP invited other countries from the region (Indonesia and Philippines) that had already undergone the process to share their experiences with Viet Nam. These activities helped build the government’s capacity and openness to engaging with international human rights mechanisms and, in doing so, strengthening the quality of Viet Nam’s engagement in the Universal Periodic Review. Viet Nam ensured representation at the highest level, which reflected the importance given to the Universal Periodic Review by the government. The Universal Periodic Review experience, in turn, generated greater momentum to engage with other human rights mechanisms of the United Nations. One of the follow-up measures to the Universal Periodic Review process was the government’s invitation to six Special Procedures mandate holders of the Human Rights Council to visit Viet Nam. BOX United Nations Special Procedures: The Special Procedures of the United Nations Human Rights Council are independent human rights experts with mandates to report and advise on human rights from a thematic or country-specific perspective. Special Procedures are either an individual (called Special Rapporteur or Independent Expert) or a working group, usually composed of five members. Mandate Holders serve in their personal capacities and do not receive salaries or other financial compensation for their work. They rely on government invitations and cooperation to carry out their work. Mandate holders are appointed by the Human Rights Council and their work is supported by Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). END BOX Viet Nam received four visits of United Nations Special Procedures mandate holders between 2010 and 2011: the Independent Expert on minority issues (July 2010); the Independent Expert on extreme poverty and human rights (August 2010); the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt (March 2011); and the Special Rapporteur on the right to health (November – December 2011). These visits provided significant occasions for Viet Nam to benefit from the expertise of Special Procedures in its efforts to follow up on the recommendations of the Universal Periodic Review, and to address key human rights issues in the country. The United Nations country team took a number of steps to maximize the value and impact of these visits and to optimize the benefits of the government’s engagement with the Special Procedures. As a first step, and in collaboration with OHCHR Geneva, the United Nations country team organized workshops for the government to provide guidance on the overall procedures of such visits and the mandates of the Special Procedures. During the visits, the United Nations country team and technical experts from the agencies played an important role by providing the Special Procedures with technical expertise on issues falling within their mandates. This was particularly important in Viet Nam where civil society is developing its capacity to engage in these processes. In turn, being able to draw on this expertise ensured that the Special Procedures report and recommendations reflected the realities, opportunities and challenges in the country. United Nations country team engagement with the Independent Expert on minority issues In July 2010, the Independent Expert on minority issues, Gay McDougal, visited Viet Nam. The United Nations country team viewed the visit of the Independent Expert as an opportunity to strengthen and further reinforce government efforts to address widening inequalities and persistent poverty among minority ethnic groups. Supporting the government to achieve inclusive and equitable growth is a core part of the United Nations country team’s development agenda. At the beginning of the visit, the United Nations country team organized a formal briefing with the Independent Expert to discuss key issues, challenges and opportunities. This was followed by in-depth briefings with technical experts from several United Nations agencies. The United Nation’s inter-agency approach proved extremely valuable in this process. Having all United Nations agencies around the same table provided the Independent Expert with a breadth of expertise and knowledge on a wide range of issues affecting her mandate – ethnic minority poverty, cultural diversity, sexual reproductive health for minorities and bi-lingual education. United Nations agencies’ expertise in the relevant areas enabled the Independent Expert to support the agencies’ work. It allowed the Independent Expert to draw on agency expertise to make concrete and useful recommendations that could assist the government to move forward. According to the Independent Expert, her visit was, “a great opportunity to re-introduce Viet Nam to the international human rights mechanisms. It allowed Viet Nam to share its accomplishments and the obstacles it has had to surmount with the Human Rights Council and human rights mechanisms. The government took my mission very seriously. They learned a lot from the mission on what they can expect in engaging with human rights mechanisms.” Engaging the United Nations Independent Expert on minority issues in support of bilingual education for ethnic minorities Internationally there has been consistent recognition of the value of bilingual education in improving learning and reducing drop-out rates.9 To examine ways by which this concept can best work in Viet Nam, the Ministry of Education and Training worked together with UNICEF to pilot a project on bilingual education in three provinces (see Box 1). In addition, to generate support among government counterparts for this approach and to ensure the government would benefit from the expertise of international human rights mechanisms, UNICEF, in collaboration with the United Nations country team, strategically engaged with the Independent Expert on minority issues during her visit in July 2010. UNICEF provided the Independent Expert with in-depth briefing notes on the legal framework for ethnic minority languages in education and their rights to use their mother tongue in school. UNICEF also held face to face meetings with the Independent Expert and organized her participation in a mother-tongue teacher training workshop. This participation enabled her to interact directly with teachers being trained. BOX Box 1: UNICEF’s Action Research on mother tongue-based bilingual education in Viet Nam UNICEF has been supporting the Ministry of Education and Training to implement and monitor a pilot project on bilingual education since 2008. The pilot project is being carried out in three provinces – Lao Cai, Gia Lai and Tra Vinh – in the minority languages of H’mong, Jrai and Khmer, respectively. Students in each province will complete the pilot programme by 2015. Through the project, teachers are trained in bilingual education techniques and provided special teaching and learning materials developed in consultation with local communities. The project is being carefully monitored for evidence of improvements in the quality of education. The ultimate objective is to feed the research results into a national education strategy that supports bilingual education.10 END BOX Results In the Independent Expert on minority issues’ report to the United Nations Human Rights Council, the issue of bilingual education for ethnic minorities featured prominently among the key recommendations. The Independent Expert explicitly referred to the example of UNICEF’s work in bilingual education and recommended that this approach be supported and expanded to other districts. According to the Independent Expert’s report, “the importance of improving the education outcomes of minorities cannot be overstated. Access to quality and appropriate education is a fundamental gateway to development and poverty eradication for minorities in Viet Nam..." The independent expert saw clear evidence that bilingual education ultimately serves to increase the potential of ethnic minority children and communities to learn and use Vietnamese…The government should permit and support bilingual education for ethnic minority children.”11 Her recommendations to Viet Nam were fully in line with the United Nations country team’s overall policy recommendations on minority issues outlined in the United Nations’ One Plan. This is an achievement realized through the engagement and cooperation of the United Nations country team with the Independent Expert during the course of her visit. Most importantly, the visit of the Independent Expert provided a powerful advocacy opportunity for the United Nations’ efforts to promote bilingual education. By validating the methodology that UNICEF and the Ministry of Education were piloting and encouraging its institutionalization, the recommendations provided authoritative inputs for UNICEF to draw upon in advocating for this approach.12 The recognition and support of the Independent Expert added weight and credibility to the methodology, providing a significant recommendation for its acceptance in the country. The Ministry of Education has now formally recognized that bilingual education is one of the solutions to strengthen ethnic minority children’s education.13 Moreover, early results from the UNICEF Action Research on mother tongue-based bilingual education are promising. As a whole, children enrolled in the programme are performing better than minority children not enrolled in the programme in language competency tests in both their mother tongue and Vietnamese. They also outperform ethnic minority students not in the programme in listening comprehension and mathematics. As a result of the encouraging results from the Action Research, this approach is increasingly being recognized as a good practice, both nationally and in the region. One provincial department of education and training has opted to use its own funds to more than double the number of bilingual education classes; 344 Mong ethnic minority children are now enrolled in these classes. Three additional provinces, Dien Ben, An Giang and Ninh Thuan, have also expressed interest in the methodology and have committed to applying the approach. The Provincial Department of Education and Training is supporting these efforts and has scaled up mother tongue-based bilingual education so that each school year from 2011 to 2015, a new group of 210 children aged five will enter mother tongue-based bilingual education classes. Specific policy recommendations on the use of bilingual education have also since been promulgated by the National Assembly and Committee for Ethnic Minorities. In addition, delegations from Myanmar and China visited Viet Nam to learn from this experience. Equally, the report from the Independent Expert raised the visibility and interest in the approach among donors and development partners in Viet Nam. These partners have expressed interest in supporting the follow-up to the Independent Expert’s recommendations. For example, the European Union delegation in Viet Nam welcomed the Independent Expert’s recommendations on the expansion of mother tongue-based instruction and requested UNICEF to prepare a concept note on how this approach could be expanded within the country. The experience of Viet Nam also highlights the important role that the United Nations country team, through its long-term presence in the country, technical expertise and normative mandate, can play in supporting the government to follow up on recommendations of the Special Procedures mandate holders. As noted by the Independent Expert, “the United Nations country team is essential and may be the only possible mechanism for follow up, given the limited capacities of Special Procedures” Since the visit of the Independent Expert on minority issues, Viet Nam’s growing engagement with other human rights mechanisms is leading to greater international exposure on the issue of bilingual education. The country recently reported to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (March 2012)14 and the Committee on the Rights of the Child (June 2012).15 Both Committees, in their Concluding Observations to Viet Nam, urged the country to increase the provision of bilingual education programmes for ethnic minority children, further supporting and validating Viet Nam’s efforts in this area. Lessons Learned The Universal Periodic Review presents an opportunity for government to strengthen its engagement with all international human rights mechanisms and for the United Nations country team to support government capacity in engaging with these mechanisms. The United Nations country team can play an important role in maximizing the value and impact of the visits of Special Procedures mandate holders. Engaging with the United Nations country team during a country visit allows the Special Procedures to draw upon the expertise of development agencies to offer concrete and useful recommendations that can help the government move forward on human rights issues. Access to quality and appropriate education is a gateway to development and poverty reduction for minorities. The introduction of bilingual education for minority children can help these children to make better early progress and creates strong and culturallyappropriate foundations for their future schooling. The recommendations of international human rights mechanisms can provide valuable and authoritative inputs to integrate human rights into United Nations advocacy, policy and programming initiatives to further development outcomes. The visits of Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council can ensure that government efforts to address human rights challenges and to mainstream human rights into development programmes benefit from internationally-recognized expertise. Endnotes UNICEF Action research brief UNICEF, Vietnam and the Millennium Development Goals United Nations in Viet Nam Website United Nations compilation report to the Universal Periodic Review, OHCHR, March 2009, A/HRC/WG.6/5/VNM/2. Viet Nam Millennium Development Goals National Report 2010, p. 114. Concluding Observations by the Committee on the Rights of the Child, Viet Nam, June, 2012, CRC/C/VNM/CO/3-4. Concerns over access to freedom of information, the independence of the media from the State, freedom of assembly, the ability of individuals, groups and civil society to express their opinions or dissent publicly were noted at the interactive dialogue of the Universal Periodic Review of Viet Nam by the Human Rights Council in May 2009: A/HRC/12/11. Report of the Independent Expert on minority issues, Gay McDougall, January 2011, A/HRC/16/45/Add.2. Mission to Viet Nam (5-15 July 2010) UNICEF Annual Report 2010, p. 23. UNICEF Action research brief  Report of the United Nations Independent Expert on minority issues, Gay McDougall, 24 January 2011, A/HRC/16/45/Add.2 paras. 85, 87 and 89. Mission to Viet Nam (5-15 July 2010) UNESCO has been a key partner with UNICEF in advocating for and promoting multilingual education in Viet Nam. The 2011 “Management Document on Teaching Vietnamese to Ethnic Minority Students” of the Ministry of Education and Training, explicitly cites the Action Research on mother tongue-based bilingual education as one of the four solutions to improving education for children of ethnic minorities. Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Viet Nam, March 2012: CERD/C/VNM/CO/10-14. Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, Viet Nam, June 2012: CRC/C/VNM/CO/3-4.